feat(firestore): add retry support for WriteBatch commit

[developerjamiu]

Related Issues

Fixes #63

Problem

Standalone write operations (set, update, create, delete) use WriteBatch._commit() to send a single HTTP request to Firestore. If the server returns a transient error such as UNAVAILABLE, RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED, or ABORTED, the operation fails immediately with no retry — even though the same request sent moments later would succeed.

The retry infrastructure (ExponentialBackoff, commitRetryCodes) was already ported from the Node.js SDK but never wired into the commit path.

Solution

Added a retry loop to WriteBatch._commit() using the existing ExponentialBackoff and _maybeBackoff() utilities, matching the pattern already used in _runTransaction().

Retry codes follow the Node.js SDK (write-batch.ts line 443): ABORTED + commitRetryCodes (RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED, UNAVAILABLE).

Transaction commits are excluded from this retry loop — they pass a transactionId and are already retried at the transaction layer.

Changes

• write_batch.dart: retry loop in _commit() for standalone commits
• write_batch_test.dart: 5 tests covering retry and non-retry paths

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]).

• I have updated the CHANGELOG.md of the relevant packages.
  Changelog files must be edited under the form:

## Unreleased minor

- Added retry support for `WriteBatch.commit()` on transient errors (`ABORTED`, `UNAVAILABLE`, `RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED`). (thanks to @developerjamiu)

• If this contains new features or behavior changes,
  I have updated the documentation to match those changes.

[demolaf]

Hi @developerjamiu thanks for opening this PR.

Looks good, only thing left to do is pull the most recent changes and pending comment. Ready to approve and merge after that, thanks.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@63ba6a4). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #188   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   74.59%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      105           
  Lines           ?     6801           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     5073           
  Misses          ?     1728           
  Partials        ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	74.59% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.