If TLS fails, then close the socket#475
Merged
lovelydinosaur merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Jan 5, 2022
Merged
Conversation
|
Does this mean connection.py is already fixed? |
Contributor
Author
|
This fixes the same issue as that alternative approach, yes. |
What update will the home assistant include? The library isn't theirs, is it? |
|
Did you make this change as per the patch? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alternative to #443
Would prefer to go with this fix because this also handles TLS failure in other cases (In particular #443 doesn't cover TLS failure in the proxy tunnelling case)