forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Implement "concentrated recovery" of LLMQ signatures #3389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
codablock
merged 10 commits into
dashpay:develop
from
codablock:pr_concentrated_recovery
Apr 2, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
45064d8
Rename sigSharesToSend to sigShareBatchesToSend
codablock b212f21
Implement new way of concentrated signature recovery
codablock 5edbeaf
Also run llmq-signing.py with spork21 enabled
codablock 80533f6
Implement "quorum selectquorum" RPC
codablock beaf3f4
Implement DashTestFramework.get_mninfo
codablock 91f811e
Test failure of recovery on first node
codablock 900ee0f
Use range based for loop in SelectMemberForRecovery
codablock 76b6614
Use auto keyword in CollectSigSharesToSend
codablock 47bd5d7
Only update id in spork21 case
codablock 148bbdd
Use GetTime instead of GetAdjustedTime
codablock File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was the number of
.recoveryMemberschosen arbitrarily? I noticed the smaller quorums use a higher percent of the overall LLMQ size.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah...mostly arbitrary. I chose the numbers in an absolute way because there wouldn't be a good percentage that would work well on all LLMQ types.