Update coverage to work with Bazel 9 - #3944
Merged
Merged
Conversation
UebelAndre
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 1, 2026 21:02
UebelAndre
enabled auto-merge
April 1, 2026 21:02
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When
--experimental_split_coverage_postprocessingis enabled (default in Bazel 9), Bazel no longer setsRUNFILES_DIRduring coverage collection. The coverage script now treatsRUNFILES_DIRas optional -- when absent, it resolvesllvm-cov,llvm-profdata, and the test binary directly from the exec root usingCOVERAGE_DIRto derive the configuration bin directory via a newconfig_bin_dirhelper.