[FastMath] Add cuda & x86 schedules for fast_softmax#8150
Merged
jcf94 merged 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom May 31, 2021
Merged
Conversation
merrymercy
approved these changes
May 28, 2021
mehrdadh
pushed a commit
to mehrdadh/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2021
* Add cuda & x86 schedules for fast_softmax * Bug fix * Re-trigger CI
trevor-m
pushed a commit
to trevor-m/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2021
* Add cuda & x86 schedules for fast_softmax * Bug fix * Re-trigger CI
trevor-m
pushed a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2021
* Add cuda & x86 schedules for fast_softmax * Bug fix * Re-trigger CI
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an additional CR to #8138. Add x86 & cuda schedules for fast_softmax.
Though I'm not sure if this will be the best schedule in these two targets, this should work better than the non-fast one. For better performance, AutoScheduler will do a good job.
cc @merrymercy