Skip to content

[Relay] Handle memory scope during lowering from relay level#11874

Merged
junrushao merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Deelvin:amalyshe/textures_tecompiler
Jun 29, 2022
Merged

[Relay] Handle memory scope during lowering from relay level#11874
junrushao merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Deelvin:amalyshe/textures_tecompiler

Conversation

@elvin-n
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@elvin-n elvin-n commented Jun 24, 2022

Relay expressions can have assigned virtual devices with certain
memory scope. This change landing of memory scope information from
Relay level to tir

This PR is a part of origin PR11357
@csullivan @mbs-octoml

Relay expressions can have assigned virtual devices with certain
memory scope. This change landing of memory scope information from
Relay level to tir
Comment thread include/tvm/driver/driver_api.h Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@junrushao junrushao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@junrushao junrushao merged commit 7ef6811 into apache:main Jun 29, 2022
blackkker pushed a commit to blackkker/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
…11874)

Relay expressions can have assigned virtual devices with certain
memory scope. This change landing of memory scope information from
Relay level to tir
masahi pushed a commit to masahi/tvm that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2022
…11874)

Relay expressions can have assigned virtual devices with certain
memory scope. This change landing of memory scope information from
Relay level to tir
mikeseven pushed a commit to mikeseven/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
…11874)

Relay expressions can have assigned virtual devices with certain
memory scope. This change landing of memory scope information from
Relay level to tir
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants