Tvm explorer infrastructure#92
Conversation
- Enchance the span filling - Enchance the schedule visualization
- Rebased
chunit-quic
force-pushed
the
tvm_explorer_infrastructure
branch
from
9058a33 to
27e7cfb
Compare
tkonolige
left a comment
tkonolige
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for doing all this work the improve debugging in TVM! I think this is a great step forward.
| # Drawbacks | ||
| [drawbacks]: #drawbacks | ||
|
|
||
| * Process extra debug information would cause longer compilation time: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Have you done any tests to see how much this may increase compile times? My guess is it would not be too bad.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @tkonolige,
Thanks for comments! :D
Yes, we have a profiling results in the forum.
For your reference. You can find the details in the end of this post.
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/pre-rfc-tvm-explorer-infrastructure/13457/14?u=chunit
|
i think we are good on the pre-RFC thread, let's merge this then. @chunit-quic can you create an RFC tracking issue (i.e. "feature tracking" here) for this one? |
Hi @areusch , |
3 participants
Hi community:
Follow the guide in the README.md, this PR is summited for the forum topic:
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/tvm-explorer-infrastructure/13457
Thank you!