Skip to content

[fix](nereids) convert stringLikeLiteral to double should use byte length (#43776) branch-2.1#43911

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.1from
englefly:pick-43776-br2.1
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

[fix](nereids) convert stringLikeLiteral to double should use byte length (#43776) branch-2.1#43911
yiguolei merged 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.1from
englefly:pick-43776-br2.1

Conversation

@englefly
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

pick #43776

The optimizer maps different data types to Double, allowing for a unified comparison of literals.
StringLikeLiteral is regarded as a long int, and map the long int to double.
To extract the first N bytes from a string, you should use String.getBytes().length instead of String.length().

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

…ngth (apache#43776)

The optimizer maps different data types to Double, allowing for a
unified comparison of literals.
StringLikeLiteral is regarded as a long int, and map the long int to
double.
To extract the first N bytes from a string, you should use
String.getBytes().length instead of String.length().
@doris-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@englefly
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

run buildall

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 59c8663 into apache:branch-2.1 Nov 14, 2024
@englefly englefly deleted the pick-43776-br2.1 branch November 30, 2024 03:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants