[Improvement](inverted index) lazy init inverted index file reader#38979
Merged
airborne12 merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom Aug 7, 2024
Merged
[Improvement](inverted index) lazy init inverted index file reader#38979airborne12 merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
airborne12 merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
Member
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41544 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 169779 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.96 s |
Member
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41302 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 168034 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.85 s |
Member
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Member
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41223 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 168581 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.99 s |
dataroaring
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2024
…38979) ## Proposed changes We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss. So we lazy init when we open specific index.
wyxxxcat
pushed a commit
to wyxxxcat/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
…pache#38979) ## Proposed changes We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss. So we lazy init when we open specific index.
dataroaring
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…38979) ## Proposed changes We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss. So we lazy init when we open specific index.
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss.
So we lazy init when we open specific index.