[Fix](Nereids) fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name#34838
Merged
englefly merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom May 16, 2024
Merged
[Fix](Nereids) fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name#34838englefly merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
englefly merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
morrySnow
reviewed
May 15, 2024
| } | ||
| return visitChildren(this, logicalCTE, context); | ||
| Plan cte = visitChildren(this, logicalCTE, context); | ||
| if (!aliasQueries.isEmpty()) { |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 39551 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 187931 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.43 s |
morrySnow
approved these changes
May 15, 2024
github-actions
Bot
added
the
approved
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
englefly
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
Contributor
|
run performance |
dataroaring
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2024
fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name Example: with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1 select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3; Reason: in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
LiBinfeng-01
added a commit
to LiBinfeng-01/doris
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…he#34838) fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name Example: with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1 select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3; Reason: in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…) (#35047) fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name Example: with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1 select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3; Reason: in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
LiBinfeng-01
added a commit
to LiBinfeng-01/doris
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
…he#34838) fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name Example: with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1 select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3; Reason: in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
morrySnow
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
cherry-pick: #34838 fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name. Example: with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1 select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3; Reason: in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
mongo360
pushed a commit
to mongo360/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…he#35600) cherry-pick: apache#34838 fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name. Example: with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1 select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3; Reason: in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
HappenLee
pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
…he#34838) fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name Example: with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1 select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3; Reason: in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
fix leading with cte and same subqueryalias name
Example:
with tbl1 as select t1.c1 from t1
select tbl2.c2 from (select / * + leading(t2 tbl1) * / tbl1.c1, t2.c2 from tbl1 join t2) as tbl2 join t3;
Reason:
in this case, before getting analyzed preprocess would change subquery tbl2 to cte plan, and this cte plan should be in upper level cte plan, but not in logical result sink plan
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...