Replace `GetFieldAccessExpr::NamedStructField` with `ScalarFunction::Struct`

[jayzhan211]

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

Follow up from #9492, we replace ListRange and ListIndex to array_slice and array element respectively.
NamedStructField is also possible to be rewritten to Struct function.

https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/f1f09653319aea3186c2b1f9ca103ef7030c2da1/datafusion/physical-expr/src/expressions/get_indexed_field.rs#L138-L162

Describe the solution you'd like

Replace NamedStructField with Struct function
I think it may be relative easy issue since it should be similar to #9492. But, not sure if it is easy enough to be a good first issue. I think you can consider it as good second issue 😆

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

[alamb]

Specificlaly, I think we would need to:

1. Add a "get_field(struct_array, field_name)" function
2. Use that function instead of NamedStructField

[yyy1000]

I port Struct function in #9546
I think after that I can take this issue. :)

[yyy1000]

take

[yyy1000]

Ah, I found the struct function has different meaning than NamedStructField, so I'm trying to implement get_field(struct_array, field_name) as @alamb said. It will take some time because I kind of stuck on return_type_from_exprs method. (I think the return type will depends on the param)

[yyy1000]

Update: I finished the PR at #9563
Could you help me review it when you are available? @alamb @jayzhan211
Thanks!