Restart xl2tpd service when the VPN configuration is modified#12422
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.22 #12422 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 17.59% 17.59% -0.01%
+ Complexity 15601 15597 -4
============================================
Files 5910 5910
Lines 529780 529780
Branches 64729 64729
============================================
- Hits 93226 93202 -24
- Misses 426060 426084 +24
Partials 10494 10494
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16356 |
|
[LL] Trillian Build Failed (tid-7166) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
|
||
| CsHelper.execute("ipsec update") | ||
| CsHelper.execute("systemctl start xl2tpd") | ||
| if config_changed: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we just not use systemctl restart x12tpd?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure if restarting xl2tpd will drop existing connections or not. So, I didn't want to restart the service unnecessarily.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is systemctl reload x12tpd supported ?
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@borisstoyanov a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
@vishesh92 the PR is based off and targeted to 4.22, but the issue and PR are marked for 20.3. Can you resolve that? |
There are code changes in this file between 4.20 and 4.22 branch. This will result in conflicts during forward merge. |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15304)
|
so, …? the resolution is marking it for milestone 22.1? |
Yes. Let me update the milestones. |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@kiranchavala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16612 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@borisstoyanov a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15336)
|

Description
Fixes #12195
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?