Fix HITL review showing altered agent output to reviewers#70070
Merged
guan404ming merged 3 commits intoJul 22, 2026
Merged
Conversation
guan404ming
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 18, 2026 09:29
guan404ming
marked this pull request as draft
July 18, 2026 11:05
guan404ming
force-pushed
the
fix-hitl-review-xcom-double-deserialize
branch
from
July 18, 2026 12:44
c58e9d1 to
4209616
Compare
guan404ming
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 19, 2026 07:17
kaxil
reviewed
Jul 21, 2026
kaxil
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
gopidesupavan
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
guan404ming
force-pushed
the
fix-hitl-review-xcom-double-deserialize
branch
from
July 22, 2026 02:14
7053f6f to
b7cc499
Compare
Member
Author
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
The human review panel could display something different from what the agent actually produced: JSON-looking text was shown as a Python dict and "true" became True, so reviewers approved content that didn't match the task's real output.
How
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?