Feat/multi tenancy v2 adapter and connector processor

[muhammad-ali-e]

NOTE

• This PR is intended to make a copy of the existing applications to facilitate the transition to v2. It does not aim to change or optimize the existing code.
• Review comments can be added as TODO items for future enhancements.

What

• Introduced v2 changes for the adapter_processor and connector_processor applications.

Why

• To align with the updated architecture and ensure compatibility with v2 applications.
• To streamline the handling of organization contexts without relying on django_tenants.

How

• Updated imports to reference v2 instead of v1 applications.
• Revised the get_organization method to utilize the user context.
• Renamed application in apps.py of adapter_processor.
• Added new models with updated table names in adapter_processor with a mixin DefaultOrganizationMixin.
• Added AdapterInstanceModelManager with DefaultOrganizationManagerMixin to get the organization data.

Can this PR break any existing features. If yes, please list possible items. If no, please explain why. (PS: Admins do not merge the PR without this section filled)

• The new methods are self-contained and changes are under feature flags ensuring no impact on current functionality.

Database Migrations

Env Config

Relevant Docs

Related Issues or PRs

1. unstract-multi-tenantV2 feature-flag changes #422
2. Feat/multi tenancy v2 context and organization #430
3. Version 2 of User/Organization Account Module #431
4. version 2 of user/organization tenant account module - UN-1424 #432
5. v2 changes of platform settings #447
6. v2 changes of connector and connector_auth #461
7. v2 changes of workflow with endpoints #464

Dependencies Versions

Notes on Testing

Screenshots

Checklist

I have read and understood the Contribution Guidelines.

[hari-kuriakose]

@muhammad-ali-e Models look good.

Ignoring duplication for now. Also all the migration files can be generated later together.

[gaya3-vijayakumar]

Don't we need the organization fields for Connector also? Not seeing this in this PR> Is there another PR where this is covered? @muhammad-ali-e

[muhammad-ali-e]

Don't we need the organization fields for Connector also? Not seeing this in this PR> Is there another PR where this is covered? @muhammad-ali-e

@gaya3-zipstack Here it is #461

[gaya3-vijayakumar]

Changes look good.

[github-actions]

filepath	function	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{passed}}$$	SUBTOTAL
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_logs}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_cleanup}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_cleanup\_skip}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_client\_init}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_image\_exists}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_image}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_container\_run\_config}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_container\_run\_config\_without\_mount}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_run\_container}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{TOTAL}}$$		$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{9}}$$	$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{9}}$$

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
69.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud