Conversation
ab2fd98 to
4713374
Compare
b05acbb to
a177d4c
Compare
a177d4c to
130f598
Compare
EgorkaKulikov
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2022
Collaborator
EgorkaKulikov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you very much for fixing these problems.
AbdullinAM
pushed a commit
to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2022
* Used real variable type after field access with reflection if possible * Added missing line separator after single-line block comment * Added missed initial field states for arrays * Removed field state assertions for failing tests
AbdullinAM
pushed a commit
to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2022
* Used real variable type after field access with reflection if possible * Added missing line separator after single-line block comment * Added missed initial field states for arrays * Removed field state assertions for failing tests
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes for several consecutive bugs with field assertions:
Also, added line separator after single-line block comment.
See corresponding tests behavior in Manual Testing section.
Type of Change
How Has This Been Tested?
Automated Testing
org.utbot.examples.codegen.modifiers.ClassWithPrivateMutableFieldOfPrivateTypeTestManual Scenario
Consider the following code:
and generate tests for the method
stringRegexwith the following settings:[Java, JUnit4, No mocks, 60s timeout, useConcreteExecution = true].Here the JUnit4 method
assertTrueis invoked using reflection because of variablefinalStringRegexPatternCompiledwith typeObject.But in this example this variable may be safely casted to its type
boolean, and reflection usage for theassertTrueusage would be redundant.So, expected code:
There are no assertions for
finalStringRegexPatternNamedGroupsandfinalStringRegexPatternGroupNodesbecause they have array types and are filtered out from initial states by mistake.So, expected code is:
that contains assertions for these fields.
stringRegex.stringRegex(string);.So, all these field assertions are redundant because they will never be invoked, and the last statement of this test method has to be MUT invocation.
Checklist (remove irrelevant options):