Skip to content

Conversation

@Tithi234
Copy link
Contributor

@Tithi234 Tithi234 commented Feb 4, 2026

Describe your change:

  • Handles zero input cases correctly for LCM
  • Ensures LCM results are always non-negative
  • Improves correctness without changing existing algorithm structure

What type of change is this?

  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md
  • This pull request is all my own work
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing

Tithi234 and others added 2 commits February 4, 2026 12:15
Updated docstrings to clarify LCM function behavior with zero inputs and adjusted expected results in tests.
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Feb 4, 2026
@Tithi234
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tithi234 commented Feb 4, 2026

Thanks for the review and automated checks.

I’m closing this PR to avoid confusion as the current CI checks are failing.
I’ll take time to fix the issues properly and open a clean follow-up PR
that fully follows the contribution guidelines.

Appreciate the maintainers’ work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant