Skip to content

Evaluation: pycg #171

@dgarijo

Description

@dgarijo

If one of the claims is that we are better than the state of the art, we need to compare against pycg.

  • design evaluation
  • have test examples
  • bring corpus from pycg
  • design new use cases

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions