Conversation
|
Caution Review failedPull request was closed or merged during review 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR refactors multiple API route handlers to delegate backend HTTP proxying to a shared Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
…ub.com/ProjectTech4DevAI/kaapi-frontend into feat/refactor-routes-phase-1
app/api/evaluations/[id]/route.ts
Outdated
| // Set to true to use mock data, false to use real backend | ||
| const USE_MOCK_DATA = false; | ||
|
|
||
| // === MOCK DATA (remove this section when no longer needed) === |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think mock data Is needed .. I guess initially it was created for some testing purposes .. now I this can be removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, I will remove this.
Isssue: #71
Summary:
apiClientfunction in theroute.tsfile.apiClientfunction if theform-databody then we don't need to include theContent-typein the header, in this case the browser automatically sets the Content-Type like this:Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes