Skip to content

Correct identifier#151

Merged
sydseter merged 2 commits intomainfrom
correct-identifier
Aug 5, 2025
Merged

Correct identifier#151
sydseter merged 2 commits intomainfrom
correct-identifier

Conversation

@sydseter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@sydseter sydseter commented Aug 5, 2025

5 has been used for the previous list above.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jgadsden jgadsden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a good change, thanks @sydseter
As we have the hood up, could we also consider rewording this line 52:

9. Avoid the use of known vulnerable functions (e.g., printf, strcat, strcpy etc.)

to be less C language specific? such as rewording as "9. Avoid the use of known vulnerable functions"

Unless it is only C that has known vulnerable functions, which may be the case

@sydseter sydseter merged commit 0cde6ca into main Aug 5, 2025
@sydseter sydseter mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2025
@jgadsden jgadsden deleted the correct-identifier branch January 11, 2026 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants