Matthias/ruby singleton - #296
Conversation
… of singleton classes ahead.
|
Can someone look at this and make a decision? |
|
The last time 296 was looked at it was theoretically ok to merge, It looks like 296 has changes to the VM that I would have to merge Please build a complete list of everything besides 296 that needs merging On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Ryan Davis notifications@github.com
|
|
Based on that - I think we should pass for now - I don't want to hold up the Darwin build Sent from my iPhone On Mar 17, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Allen Otis notifications@github.com wrote: The last time 296 was looked at it was theoretically ok to merge, It looks like 296 has changes to the VM that I would have to merge Please build a complete list of everything besides 296 that needs merging On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Ryan Davis notifications@github.com
|
|
We may want to look at this again eventually. There was an issue with Rails 4 without this... |
|
I agree - I'd love to get this merged in soon. @AllenOtis - when could we get a darwin build? I'll bet @zenspider's work on the parser will need some other VM changes - which we could include with this. We could shoot for another VM build after the hack week this summer. |
|
Agreed - I didn't mean to close this PR - I deleted the I'd love to chat about this more and get it merged in (after we get a darwin build). |
Only works with modified GemStone VM (same branch on MagLev/HPI-GSS). See #291.