Skip to content

Upgrade React Native to 0.85.3#92484

Merged
mountiny merged 68 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:war-in/upgrade-to-rn-0.85
Jul 9, 2026
Merged

Upgrade React Native to 0.85.3#92484
mountiny merged 68 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:war-in/upgrade-to-rn-0.85

Conversation

@war-in

@war-in war-in commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

PR upgrades React Native to v0.85.3 and Expo SDK to v56, along with the related RN, Expo, Metro, Hermes, and React dependencies needed for the upgrade.

The change also:

  • Ports and audits the existing React Native and Expo patches for the new versions, removing obsolete patch entries where applicable.
  • Updates native build tooling/configuration, including Gradle 9.3.1, CocoaPods/RN source-build flags, and iOS header search paths required by the upgraded RN toolchain.
  • Keeps React Native fetch enabled for Expo SDK 56 builds and adapts Metro source-map handling for Expo packed maps.
  • Updates the Mobile-Expensify submodule to align with the paired RN 0.85.3 Mobile-Expensify PR.

Fixed Issues

$ #91629
PROPOSAL:
MOBILE-EXPENSIFY: https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/13959

Tests

Requires full regression tests on the entire app.

Offline tests

Requires full regression tests on the entire app in offline, spotty connection, and slow internet states where the tested flows support those modes.

QA Steps

Requires full regression tests on the entire app.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/FullscreenLoadingIndicator.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/LoadingIndicator.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/RenderHTML.tsx 95.23% <100.00%> (+0.23%) ⬆️
...pages/inbox/report/comment/TextCommentFragment.tsx 80.39% <100.00%> (+1.22%) ⬆️
src/styles/index.ts 60.30% <ø> (ø)
src/components/SAMLLoadingIndicator.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ents/HTMLEngineProvider/BaseHTMLEngineProvider.tsx 81.69% <79.31%> (ø)
... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes

@war-in

war-in commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@parasharrajat have you tried switching to this branch? Looks like your Mobile-Expensify submodule was not updated

@mountiny

mountiny commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry more confclits

@parasharrajat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Checking..

war-in added 2 commits July 9, 2026 13:53
# Conflicts:
#	patches/react-native/details.md
#	patches/react-native/react-native+0.85.3+008+iOSCoreAnimationBorderRendering.patch
@war-in

war-in commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mountiny conflicts resolved and I also updated patches, so the ordering is now correct

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

09.07.2026_18.08.43_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

09.07.2026_18.10.56_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / native

09.07.2026_18.35.09_REC.mp4

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Didn't find any issues during my testing.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from mountiny and roryabraham July 9, 2026 13:12
@parasharrajat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

THere is synk error here @war-in

@war-in

war-in commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

THere is synk error here @war-in

Yeah, I don't have access to snyk so I can't verify it. I already asked @mountiny and I'm waiting for him to jump in

@Julesssss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The error is simply 0009 invalid packages which I believe we expect. Similarly the Mobile-Expensify test check will fail until both PRs are merged.

So we should be good to merge... But of course as I was writing this comment a new conflict arose on this App PR 😞

# Conflicts:
#	cspell.json
#	tests/unit/scheduleMacrotaskTest.ts

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The knip failure is stale from main, this pr does not touch the file it is complaining about

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 3e5238b into Expensify:main Jul 9, 2026
44 of 45 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot added the Emergency label Jul 9, 2026
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mountiny looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@Julesssss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mountiny looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

Expected. Removing label

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #92484.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-3e5238b24da-54ebcb2-2b27b9fef52c251bf265896632f86d43e837bc94/index.html ❌ FAILED ❌
Android The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Web 🕸️
https://92484.pr-testing.expensify.com
Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.33-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants