-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Add hasFailedOnfido to acceptWalletTerms failureData #85579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ function acceptWalletTerms(parameters: AcceptWalletTermsParams) { | |
| value: { | ||
| isPendingOnfidoResult: null, | ||
| shouldShowFailedKYC: true, | ||
| hasFailedOnfido: true, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes the failed-KYC marker local to the client that submitted Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. hmmm @Valforte , I think this does make sense , should we push the update in Auth ?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah it should have a push in the backend so all devices are updated. Can you work on it as a follow up?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Actually I see it should be done in Auth instead of this PR. What's your thought?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. YEahh ,i agree the update should be sent in auth it makes more sense !, I'll raise a follow up on monday
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. lets put this PR on hold, i don't think we would need this PR really after we merge the auth one |
||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.