Pass down url parameters when the native app is opened from browser#15262
Conversation
|
@marcochavezf @parasharrajat One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@allroundexperts As we know hash can be useful too so let's add Hash to the URL as well.
|
@allroundexperts Can you please improve your commit messages? These messages are useless. Try to explain what changes you did. |
|
Thank you for the feedback @parasharrajat. I have updated the code and commit message. Please let me know if there's anything else that needs to be changed. |
|
Please update the title of this PR as well. Can you also mention offline tests as well? |
@parasharrajat I have updated the title. As far as I've understood, offline tests are not applicable here since the page won't really load if you're offline. Please correct me if the case is otherwise. |
|
@allroundexperts I am not able to test this PR with your steps. How did you test it on local server? |
I ran the desktop app locally. I also ran web app locally as well. Once both are running, I just open the web app in logged in state. This causes the web app to open a alert that asks to open the app on dekstop. Clicking on it, opens the electron app. |
|
Ok, let me test it with the local build of the desktop app. |
FYI, I did not run a built version of the app. I ran the app using |
|
Ok, so I am not getting the promot. I decline the prompt on the staging web app. Does it have to do anything with local as well? Is there a way to get it back? Can you please update the tests and QA steps to add all the instructions? Whether the user has to install the desktop app first or not? etc... Also, add videos for all platforms. Did you really run all the checks from the checklist or just checked it all? |
|
I am able to see the prompt on staging app but not on local. I tried both safari and chrome. Can you please update the video to show the full address bar? |
@parasharrajat This is not applicable for mobile. Can you please guide me which screens to test on mobile? |
|
For the platforms where it does not apply, you can show the working app videos. |
Thanks for letting me know. I'll update these and will let you know here. |
|
@parasharrajat It seems like I had a |
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
cc: @marcochavezf
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
|
Things remaining from #15262 (comment) comment. |
@parasharrajat Added screen recordings and updated the steps. |
|
Thanks guys! LGTM I removed point |
Performance Comparison Report 📊Significant Changes To Duration
Show details
Meaningless Changes To DurationShow entries
Show details
|
|
@Expensify/mobile-deployers 📣 Please look into this performance regression as it's a deploy blocker. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcochavezf in version: 1.2.78-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.2.78-0 🚀
|




Details
The link to the desktop app does not forward query parameters. The DetailsPage component expects route params present. Without it, the app crashes.
Fixed Issues
$ #15059
PROPOSAL: #15059 (comment)
Tests
ENVIRONMENT=stagingto it.Offline tests
Not relevant
QA Steps
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectiontoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodWaiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.STYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)/** comment above it */thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor)thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.Screenshots/Videos
Screen.Recording.2023-02-18.at.2.09.41.AM.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-02-25.at.3.58.57.AM.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-02-25.at.4.05.50.AM.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-02-25.at.4.11.46.AM.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-02-25.at.4.13.30.AM.mov