[Onboarding Flow] Added database checks to the onboarding flow

[O-Bots]

Changes

• Added database checks to the on-boarding flow test suite
• Fixed Faker username generation so it follows compass guidelines (No symbols)

[vercel]

@O-Bots is attempting to deploy a commit to the Compass Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
backend/shared/src/firebase-utils.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
backend/shared/src/supabase/init.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
common/src/supabase/utils.ts	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[MartinBraquet]

Thanks! Could you check why the E2E tests failed?

[875](https://github.com/CompassConnections/Compass/actions/runs/22495983703/job/65170489004?pr=34#step:9:9876)
    ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

    Retry #2 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

    Error: expect(received).toContain(expected) // indexOf

    Expected substring: "living room"
    Received string:    "university"

       at web/pages/profilePage.ts:233

      231 |     const textContent = await this.workAreaAboutSection.textContent()
      232 |     for (let i = 0; i < workArea.length; i++) {
    > 233 |       await expect(textContent?.toLowerCase()).toContain(workArea[i].toLowerCase())
          |                                                ^
      234 |     }
      235 |   }
      236 |
        at ProfilePage.verifyWorkArea (/home/runner/work/Compass/Compass/tests/e2e/web/pages/profilePage.ts:233:48)
        at /home/runner/work/Compass/Compass/tests/e2e/web/specs/onboardingFlow.spec.ts:96:5

    Error Context: test-results/web-specs-onboardingFlow-w-7ed2b-omplete-the-onboarding-flow-main-retry2/error-context.md

  1 failed

logs_58824779751.zip

[O-Bots]

Just had a look at this, no idea what is happening ran the tests on my pc with nothing changed, all passed.

any ideas/possible solutions are welcomed

[MartinBraquet]

Looks great now! Thanks for adding the checks. I also added a few features at the same time, so the PR got bigger...
In the end, I can't really tell which change fixed the failing CI test. Must have been a really small bug somewhere in the pipeline, nothing major.