From aeb0d993f8d8dc5469945a850024d85975a889ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:31:34 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] Initial plan


From c9873b19e1a11e265b8f68409a16e66c372c0155 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:37:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 02/12] Add comprehensive documentation of unresolved review
 comments

Co-authored-by: TheOriginalBytePlayer <18058224+TheOriginalBytePlayer@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md | 452 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 452 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md

diff --git a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b61e69009392
--- /dev/null
+++ b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
@@ -0,0 +1,452 @@
+# Unresolved Code Review Comments
+
+This document captures all unresolved code review comments from merged PRs #1 and #2. These comments were made by automated code review but were not addressed before the PRs were merged.
+
+## Table of Contents
+
+1. [PR #2: FrameForge Sidecar (22 comments)](#pr-2-frameforge-sidecar)
+   - [IPC Handler (8 comments)](#ipc-handler-pr-2)
+   - [Sidecar Application (6 comments)](#sidecar-application)
+   - [Validator (4 comments)](#validator)
+   - [CMake and Testing (4 comments)](#cmake-and-testing)
+2. [PR #1: Semantic Server (14 comments)](#pr-1-semantic-server)
+   - [IPC Handler (5 comments)](#ipc-handler-pr-1)
+   - [Intent Engine (5 comments)](#intent-engine)
+   - [Server Application (2 comments)](#server-application)
+   - [Command Validator (2 comments)](#command-validator)
+
+---
+
+## PR #2: FrameForge Sidecar
+
+### IPC Handler (PR #2)
+
+#### 1. Message Size Validation - Windows (Line 327)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The message size validation allows sizes up to MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE (1MB), but there's no check to ensure msg_size is greater than 0 before attempting to read. While msg_size == 0 is checked, the allocation of an empty string and the read attempt could be avoided by returning early when msg_size is 0.
+
+**Owner Requests:** @TheOriginalBytePlayer requested this be applied (mentioned 2 times)
+
+**Suggested Fix:**
+```cpp
+if (msg_size == 0 || msg_size > MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE) {
+    return "";  // Early return for invalid sizes
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+#### 2. Message Size Validation - Unix (Line 350)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The same message size validation issue exists here. When msg_size is 0 or exceeds MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE, an early return happens after the check, but the logic could be clearer by checking msg_size > 0 before the upper bound check to avoid allocating an empty string.
+
+**Owner Requests:** @TheOriginalBytePlayer requested this be applied (mentioned 1 time)
+
+**Suggested Fix:** Same as #1 above
+
+---
+
+#### 3. Non-blocking I/O Error Handling (Line 162)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp`
+**Severity:** High
+**Comment:** The Unix pipe implementation opens the pipe with O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK, but non-blocking mode could cause write and read operations to fail with EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK. The code doesn't handle these errors, which could lead to incomplete message transmission. Consider using blocking mode or implementing proper retry logic for non-blocking I/O.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Implement retry logic for EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK or switch to blocking mode
+
+---
+
+#### 4. IPCServer Message Callback Not Invoked (Line 112)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp`
+**Severity:** High
+**Comment:** The IPCServer class has a set_message_callback method, but the callback is never invoked anywhere in the implementation. The server_loop_windows and server_loop_unix methods are declared but not implemented, which means received messages cannot be processed. This makes the message_callback_ member variable unused.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Implement server_loop methods or remove unused callback functionality
+
+---
+
+#### 5. Missing IPC Test Coverage (Line 362)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The IPC implementation (frameforge-ipc.cpp) lacks test coverage. There are no tests for IPCServer or IPCClient functionality, which is critical for the system's communication layer. Consider adding tests to verify message sending/receiving, connection handling, and error scenarios.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add comprehensive IPC tests
+
+---
+
+#### 6. Security: Per-User FIFO Location (Line 140)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/README.md`
+**Severity:** High (Security)
+**Comment:** Using a fixed pipe name in `/tmp` for Unix (`/tmp/frameforge_pipe`) means any local user on the same host can open this IPC endpoint and send or read FrameForge control messages. This allows unauthorized local processes to impersonate the 32-bit bridge or eavesdrop on commands, breaking isolation between different users' sessions.
+
+**Suggested Fix:**
+Use per-user directory:
+- `$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/frameforge/frameforge_pipe`
+- or `/tmp/frameforge-$UID/frameforge_pipe` if `XDG_RUNTIME_DIR` is not set
+- Create with owner-only permissions (`chmod 700` directory, `chmod 600` FIFO)
+
+---
+
+#### 7. WAV Header Alignment Issue (Line 162)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The function uses pointer arithmetic (buf + WAV_SAMPLE_RATE_OFFSET) and casts to int32_t pointer without checking alignment. On some architectures, unaligned access can cause crashes or undefined behavior.
+
+**Suggested Fix:**
+```cpp
+int32_t sample_rate_raw;
+std::memcpy(&sample_rate_raw, buf + WAV_SAMPLE_RATE_OFFSET, sizeof(sample_rate_raw));
+sample_rate = sample_rate_raw;
+```
+
+---
+
+#### 8. stoi Exception Handling (Line 111)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The stoi function can throw std::invalid_argument or std::out_of_range exceptions if the input is not a valid integer or is out of range. The code should validate the input or catch these exceptions to provide better error messages to the user.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add try-catch blocks with user-friendly error messages
+
+---
+
+### Sidecar Application
+
+#### 9. Greedy Sampling Performance (Line 259)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The greedy sampling loop uses a linear search through all vocabulary tokens to find the maximum logit. For large vocabularies, this can be inefficient. Consider using a more efficient sampling method or at least caching the vocabulary size instead of calling llama_vocab_n_tokens(vocab) on every iteration.
+
+**Owner Requests:** @TheOriginalBytePlayer requested this be applied (mentioned 2 times)
+
+**Recommended Action:** Cache vocabulary size and consider optimized sampling algorithms
+
+---
+
+#### 10. Redundant LLM Prompt Instruction (Line 39)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Low
+**Comment:** The INTENT_SYSTEM_PROMPT describes mapping misspellings like "PIN" to "PAN", but this is already handled in the string_to_verb function. Having this instruction in the LLM prompt may be redundant and could cause confusion if the LLM tries to do the correction itself when it's already handled at the parsing layer.
+
+**Suggested Fix:** Remove redundant misspelling handling from prompt
+
+---
+
+#### 11. Server Mode Not Implemented (Line 398)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** High
+**Comment:** The server mode main loop is currently a placeholder that does nothing except sleep. The comment indicates it should receive audio data, process it, and send commands back through the pipe, but this functionality is not implemented. This makes the server mode non-functional.
+
+**Suggested Placeholder:**
+```cpp
+// NOTE: For now, we read simple text commands from standard input as a
+// placeholder for the full audio -> Whisper -> Llama -> validation pipeline.
+std::string line;
+while (std::getline(std::cin, line)) {
+    if (line == "exit" || line == "quit") {
+        fprintf(stderr, "Shutdown command received. Stopping FrameForge Sidecar.\n");
+        break;
+    }
+    fprintf(stderr, "Received command: %s\n", line.c_str());
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+#### 12. WAV Format Validation (Line 179)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The WAV file reader assumes 16-bit PCM format but doesn't validate the WAV header to confirm this. The code should check the audio format field (offset 20-21) and bits per sample field (offset 34-35) in the WAV header to ensure the file is actually 16-bit PCM before attempting to read samples as int16_t values.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add WAV header validation for audio format and bit depth
+
+---
+
+#### 13. Sample Rate Validation (Line 162)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The sample rate is read from the WAV header using a cast to int32_t pointer, but there's no validation that the sample rate is reasonable (e.g., typically 8000, 16000, 44100, or 48000 Hz). Invalid or unexpected sample rates could cause issues with Whisper processing and should be validated.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Validate sample rate against known acceptable values
+
+---
+
+#### 14. WAV Buffer Size (Line 153)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Low
+**Comment:** The WAV header reading uses a char buffer of size 256 but only reads WAV_HEADER_SIZE (44) bytes. The buffer size is unnecessarily large.
+
+**Suggested Fix:**
+```cpp
+char buf[WAV_HEADER_SIZE];
+```
+
+---
+
+### Validator
+
+#### 15. Degrees Range Documentation (Line 61)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp`
+**Severity:** Low
+**Comment:** The validate_parameter_values function checks that degrees are between -360 and 360, but this range allows for more than one full rotation. Depending on the use case, you might want to normalize angles to -180 to 180 or 0 to 360, or clarify in documentation why the extended range is allowed.
+
+**Suggested Fix:** Add documentation explaining the -360 to 360 range rationale
+
+---
+
+#### 16. Action Group Validation Logic (Line 101)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The validation logic allows cmd.action_group to be ActionGroup::UNKNOWN and still pass validation if it doesn't match the expected group. This seems inconsistent - if the action group is provided but wrong, it should fail validation. The condition should be simplified to require matching when action_group is not UNKNOWN.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Clarify and fix action group validation logic
+
+---
+
+#### 17. Missing Parameter Value Tests (Line 82)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The validation logic checks for parameter values outside the valid range but doesn't have corresponding test coverage. Consider adding tests for edge cases like degrees at exactly -360, 360, and beyond, as well as speed values at 0, 100, and beyond the valid range.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add edge case tests for parameter validation
+
+---
+
+#### 18. Additional Params Test Coverage (Line 206)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The additional_params parsing and serialization logic in lines 197-206 and 56-59 lacks test coverage. Consider adding tests to verify that additional parameters are correctly preserved during JSON round-trip conversion.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add tests for additional_params functionality
+
+---
+
+### CMake and Testing
+
+#### 19. JSON Error Handling (Line 119)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-json.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The error handling in the JSON parsing catches all exceptions with a generic "Error parsing JSON" message. Consider providing more specific error messages by catching json::parse_error, json::type_error, and json::out_of_range separately to give users better feedback about what went wrong.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add specific exception handling for different JSON error types
+
+---
+
+#### 20. JSON Termination Check (Line 283)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The JSON termination check looks for any '}' character in the response, which could prematurely terminate generation if the JSON contains nested objects or escaped braces. A more robust approach would be to parse the JSON incrementally or track brace depth to ensure the complete object is generated.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Implement brace depth tracking for JSON completion detection
+
+---
+
+#### 21. CMake EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL (Line 27)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/CMakeLists.txt`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The CMakeLists.txt uses EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL when adding the whisper subdirectory, which means whisper targets won't be built by default. However, the frameforge-sidecar target depends on the whisper library, so this could cause build issues if whisper isn't built separately.
+
+**Suggested Fix:**
+```cmake
+add_subdirectory(${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/external/whisper ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/whisper)
+```
+
+---
+
+#### 22. Tokenization Pattern Documentation (Line 227)
+**File:** `tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp`
+**Severity:** Low
+**Comment:** The tokenization call uses negative return value handling that assumes the function returns a negative value to indicate the required buffer size. However, this pattern should be documented or verified against the llama.cpp API, as it's non-standard.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add clarifying comments about the tokenization API pattern
+
+---
+
+## PR #1: Semantic Server
+
+### IPC Handler (PR #1)
+
+#### 23. Windows Handle Validation (Line 176)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h`
+**Severity:** High
+**Comment:** The pipe_handle may be invalid when send_message_windows is called if the client has disconnected between reads. This can lead to writing to an invalid handle. Consider checking if the pipe is still connected or handling the write failure more gracefully by returning false with appropriate logging.
+
+**Suggested Fix:** Add handle validation and proper error handling for disconnected clients
+
+---
+
+#### 24. Stop Method Hang (Line 73)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h`
+**Severity:** High
+**Comment:** The order of operations in the stop() method is incorrect. The thread is joined before the pipe_handle is closed, but the thread may still be blocked on ReadFile when you try to join it. On Windows, you should either close the handle first to unblock the ReadFile (which will fail), or use overlapped I/O with a cancellation mechanism.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Reorder operations: close handle first, then join thread
+
+---
+
+#### 25. Pipe Close Order (Line 223)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The code attempts to close pipe_fd and then immediately accesses it again in the next iteration of the while loop. After close(pipe_fd), the file descriptor should be set to -1 before the next iteration to avoid attempting to use a closed descriptor.
+
+**Suggested Fix:**
+```cpp
+int fd_to_close = pipe_fd;
+pipe_fd = -1;
+close(fd_to_close);
+```
+
+---
+
+#### 26. Pipe Open Failure Handling (Line 236)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** Opening a pipe with O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK may fail if no reader is currently attached to the pipe. The error is logged but the function returns false. In the context where this is called (within the message_callback in semantic-server.cpp), the failure to send a response means the client won't receive confirmation.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Consider implementing a retry mechanism or documenting expected behavior
+
+---
+
+#### 27. toupper UB with Non-ASCII (Line 170)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/command-validator.h`
+**Severity:** Low
+**Comment:** Using std::toupper without casting the char to unsigned char is undefined behavior when the char value is negative (i.e., for non-ASCII characters). While this may work for ASCII uppercase conversion, it's technically incorrect.
+
+**Suggested Fix:**
+```cpp
+c = std::toupper(static_cast<unsigned char>(c));
+```
+
+---
+
+### Intent Engine
+
+#### 28. Tokenization Failure Silent (Line 132)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** When tokenization fails (returns <= 0), the function returns an empty JSON object "{}", which will later be treated as invalid by the validator. However, this error is silent and provides no information about why tokenization failed.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Add error logging or return descriptive error through ValidationResult
+
+---
+
+#### 29. Early Stop JSON Detection (Line 178)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The early stopping logic checks if a complete JSON object exists by finding the first '}' character. However, this can produce false positives if the JSON contains nested objects or strings with '}' characters. While the code then tries to parse the JSON to verify completeness, this approach may still stop prematurely in edge cases.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Implement brace depth tracking for more robust JSON completion detection
+
+---
+
+#### 30. Exception Handling Too Broad (Line 176)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The catch-all exception handler silently continues generation when JSON parsing fails. This means the loop will continue generating tokens even if an exception occurs for a different reason (e.g., out of memory).
+
+**Recommended Action:** Log exceptions or distinguish between JSON parse errors and other exceptions
+
+---
+
+#### 31. Empty JSON on Parse Error (Line 203)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The catch-all exception handler returns an empty JSON object instead of a proper error. This makes it difficult to distinguish between successful parsing that returned an empty object and actual parsing failures.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Return null JSON value or specific error indicator
+
+---
+
+#### 32. Lost Parse Error Context (Line 102)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The code catches json::parse_error specifically but then attempts to extract JSON from text and returns another generic error if that fails. If extract_json_from_text also fails, the original parse error information is lost.
+
+**Suggested Fix:** Preserve and combine both error messages for better debugging
+
+---
+
+### Server Application
+
+#### 33. Code Duplication (Line 182)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/semantic-server.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The nested if-else structure with is_json_input checking creates duplicated code for processing and sending responses (lines 157-166 and 173-182). This violates the DRY principle and makes maintenance harder.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Extract response processing logic into a helper function
+
+---
+
+#### 34. JSON Input Validation (Line 166)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/semantic-server.cpp`
+**Severity:** Medium
+**Comment:** The code checks if JSON input contains "text" field but doesn't handle the case where input is valid JSON but doesn't contain "text". In this case, no response is sent to the client.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Either process JSON as-is or send error response for unexpected format
+
+---
+
+### Command Validator
+
+#### 35. is_json_input Initialization (Line 169)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/semantic-server.cpp`
+**Severity:** Low
+**Comment:** The variable is_json_input is set to true and then potentially set to false in the catch block, but the initial assignment to true happens before any JSON parsing attempt. This creates confusion about when the variable should be true vs false.
+
+**Suggested Fix:** Initialize to false and only set to true after successful JSON parsing
+
+---
+
+#### 36. Variable Naming (Line 123)
+**File:** `tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h`
+**Severity:** Low
+**Comment:** The variable name 'smpl' is unclear and doesn't follow common naming conventions.
+
+**Suggested Fix:** Rename to 'sampler' for better readability
+
+---
+
+## Summary Statistics
+
+- **Total Comments:** 36
+- **High Severity:** 7
+- **Medium Severity:** 23
+- **Low Severity:** 6
+- **Security Issues:** 1
+
+### By Module
+- **PR #2 (FrameForge):** 22 comments
+  - IPC Handler: 8
+  - Sidecar: 6
+  - Validator: 4
+  - CMake/Testing: 4
+  
+- **PR #1 (Semantic Server):** 14 comments
+  - IPC Handler: 5
+  - Intent Engine: 5
+  - Server: 2
+  - Command Validator: 2
+
+## Recommended Priority Order
+
+1. **Security Issues** (1 comment)
+   - Comment #6: Per-user FIFO location
+
+2. **High Severity** (6 additional comments)
+   - Comment #3: Non-blocking I/O error handling
+   - Comment #4: IPCServer callback not invoked
+   - Comment #11: Server mode not implemented
+   - Comment #23: Windows handle validation
+   - Comment #24: Stop method hang
+
+3. **Medium Severity** (23 comments)
+   - All remaining IPC, validation, and error handling issues
+
+4. **Low Severity** (6 comments)
+   - Documentation, naming, and minor refactoring issues
+
+---
+
+**Document Generated:** 2025-12-29
+**Source PRs:** #1, #2

From 50e53e058527ece5b3f729ae8cbcc66d7c4a6981 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:39:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] Add recommendations and quick reference guides

Co-authored-by: TheOriginalBytePlayer <18058224+TheOriginalBytePlayer@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 QUICK_REFERENCE.md | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 RECOMMENDATIONS.md | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 404 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 QUICK_REFERENCE.md
 create mode 100644 RECOMMENDATIONS.md

diff --git a/QUICK_REFERENCE.md b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d880ea3a6bd3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+# Quick Reference: Unresolved Comments Resolution Plan
+
+This document provides a quick reference for addressing the 36 unresolved code review comments. For full details, see `UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md`.
+
+## Priority 1: Security Issues (1 comment)
+
+| # | File | Line | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|------|-------|----------|
+| 6 | tools/frameforge/README.md | 140 | Use per-user FIFO location | 2-4 hours |
+
+**Action:** Modify IPC implementation to use `$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR` or per-user `/tmp` directory with proper permissions.
+
+## Priority 2: High Severity (7 comments)
+
+| # | File | Line | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|------|-------|----------|
+| 3 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp | 162 | Non-blocking I/O error handling | 2-3 hours |
+| 4 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp | 112 | IPCServer callback not invoked | 3-4 hours |
+| 11 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp | 398 | Server mode not implemented | 4-6 hours |
+| 23 | tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h | 176 | Windows handle validation | 2-3 hours |
+| 24 | tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h | 73 | Stop method hang | 2-3 hours |
+
+**Total Estimate:** 15-23 hours
+
+## Priority 3: Medium Severity - Critical (12 comments)
+
+### IPC & Communication
+| # | File | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|-------|----------|
+| 1 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp:327 | Message size validation (Windows) | 1 hour |
+| 2 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp:350 | Message size validation (Unix) | 1 hour |
+| 25 | tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h:223 | Pipe close order | 1 hour |
+| 26 | tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h:236 | Pipe open failure handling | 2 hours |
+
+### Validation & Error Handling
+| # | File | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|-------|----------|
+| 7 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:162 | WAV header alignment | 1 hour |
+| 8 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:111 | stoi exception handling | 1 hour |
+| 16 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp:101 | Action group validation | 2 hours |
+| 19 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-json.cpp:119 | JSON error handling | 2 hours |
+
+### Intent & Sampling
+| # | File | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|-------|----------|
+| 9 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:259 | Greedy sampling performance | 3 hours |
+| 28 | tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h:132 | Tokenization failure silent | 1 hour |
+| 29 | tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h:178 | Early stop JSON detection | 2 hours |
+| 30 | tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h:176 | Exception handling too broad | 1 hour |
+
+**Total Estimate:** 18 hours
+
+## Priority 4: Medium Severity - Important (11 comments)
+
+### Testing & Validation
+| # | File | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|-------|----------|
+| 5 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-ipc.cpp:362 | Missing IPC test coverage | 4-6 hours |
+| 12 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:179 | WAV format validation | 2 hours |
+| 13 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:162 | Sample rate validation | 1 hour |
+| 17 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp:82 | Missing parameter value tests | 2 hours |
+| 18 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp:206 | Additional params test coverage | 2 hours |
+
+### JSON & Parsing
+| # | File | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|-------|----------|
+| 20 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:283 | JSON termination check | 2 hours |
+| 31 | tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h:203 | Empty JSON on parse error | 1 hour |
+| 32 | tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h:102 | Lost parse error context | 2 hours |
+
+### Code Quality
+| # | File | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|-------|----------|
+| 21 | tools/frameforge/CMakeLists.txt:27 | CMake EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL | 1 hour |
+| 33 | tools/semantic-server/semantic-server.cpp:182 | Code duplication | 2 hours |
+| 34 | tools/semantic-server/semantic-server.cpp:166 | JSON input validation | 1 hour |
+
+**Total Estimate:** 20-22 hours
+
+## Priority 5: Low Severity (6 comments)
+
+| # | File | Issue | Estimate |
+|---|------|-------|----------|
+| 10 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:39 | Redundant LLM prompt | 30 min |
+| 14 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:153 | WAV buffer size | 15 min |
+| 15 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-validator.cpp:61 | Degrees range documentation | 30 min |
+| 22 | tools/frameforge/frameforge-sidecar.cpp:227 | Tokenization pattern docs | 30 min |
+| 27 | tools/semantic-server/command-validator.h:170 | toupper UB with non-ASCII | 15 min |
+| 35 | tools/semantic-server/semantic-server.cpp:169 | is_json_input initialization | 15 min |
+| 36 | tools/semantic-server/intent-engine.h:123 | Variable naming | 10 min |
+
+**Total Estimate:** 2.5 hours
+
+## Total Time Estimates
+
+| Priority | Count | Estimated Time |
+|----------|-------|----------------|
+| Security | 1 | 2-4 hours |
+| High | 6 | 15-23 hours |
+| Medium (Critical) | 12 | 18 hours |
+| Medium (Important) | 11 | 20-22 hours |
+| Low | 6 | 2.5 hours |
+| **TOTAL** | **36** | **57.5-69.5 hours** |
+
+## Recommended Approach
+
+### Phase 1: Security & Critical Fixes (1-2 weeks)
+1. Address security issue (#6)
+2. Fix high severity issues (#3, #4, #11, #23, #24)
+3. Add basic test coverage
+
+### Phase 2: Stability & Robustness (1-2 weeks)
+1. Fix medium severity IPC issues (#1, #2, #25, #26)
+2. Improve error handling (#7, #8, #16, #19)
+3. Optimize performance (#9)
+4. Improve validation (#12, #13, #28, #29, #30)
+
+### Phase 3: Quality & Testing (1 week)
+1. Add comprehensive tests (#5, #17, #18)
+2. Fix JSON handling issues (#20, #31, #32)
+3. Code quality improvements (#21, #33, #34)
+
+### Phase 4: Polish (1-2 days)
+1. Fix all low severity issues
+2. Documentation updates
+3. Final code review
+
+## Quick Start
+
+To get started addressing these issues:
+
+1. **Read full details:** Review `UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md` for complete context
+2. **Pick a priority group:** Start with Priority 1 (security) or Priority 2 (high severity)
+3. **Create a branch:** `git checkout -b fix/issue-N-description`
+4. **Make changes:** Follow the suggested fixes in the documentation
+5. **Test thoroughly:** Add tests for the fix
+6. **Commit with reference:** Include issue number in commit message
+7. **Request review:** Create a PR referencing this document
+
+## Testing Strategy
+
+For each fix:
+- [ ] Add unit test(s) for the specific issue
+- [ ] Verify existing tests still pass
+- [ ] Add integration test if applicable
+- [ ] Test on multiple platforms (Windows, Linux, macOS)
+- [ ] Run with sanitizers (ASAN, UBSAN, TSAN)
+- [ ] Profile performance impact if applicable
+
+## Notes
+
+- Many issues can be addressed in parallel by different developers
+- Some fixes depend on others (e.g., #4 depends on #11)
+- Consider addressing related issues together (e.g., all IPC issues)
+- Some estimates are conservative and may be faster with experience
+
+## Owner Requests
+
+The following comments have explicit requests from @TheOriginalBytePlayer to apply changes:
+
+- Comment #1: Message size validation (Windows) - **2 mentions**
+- Comment #2: Message size validation (Unix) - **1 mention**
+- Comment #9: Greedy sampling performance - **2 mentions**
+
+These should be prioritized.
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated:** 2025-12-29
+**Document Version:** 1.0
diff --git a/RECOMMENDATIONS.md b/RECOMMENDATIONS.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3c3ff32075b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/RECOMMENDATIONS.md
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+# Additional Code Quality Recommendations
+
+Beyond the unresolved code review comments documented in `UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md`, here are additional recommendations based on analysis of the codebase and common patterns observed in TODO/FIXME comments throughout llama.cpp.
+
+## General Recommendations
+
+### 1. Error Handling Consistency
+
+**Observation:** Both the frameforge and semantic-server modules have inconsistent error handling patterns.
+
+**Recommendations:**
+- Standardize error handling across both modules
+- Consider using Result<T, Error> pattern for functions that can fail
+- Add comprehensive error logging with context
+- Document expected error conditions in function comments
+
+### 2. Thread Safety
+
+**Observation:** Both IPC implementations use threading but lack explicit thread safety documentation.
+
+**Recommendations:**
+- Document thread safety guarantees for all public methods
+- Add mutex protection for shared state where needed
+- Consider using RAII locks for exception safety
+- Add thread sanitizer testing to CI
+
+### 3. Resource Management
+
+**Observation:** Manual resource management (file descriptors, handles, memory) is error-prone.
+
+**Recommendations:**
+- Use RAII wrappers for all resources
+- Consider unique_ptr with custom deleters for C resources
+- Ensure all code paths properly clean up resources
+- Add resource leak testing
+
+### 4. Testing Strategy
+
+**Observation:** Test coverage is incomplete, especially for error paths.
+
+**Recommendations:**
+- Add unit tests for all error handling paths
+- Add integration tests for IPC communication
+- Add fuzz testing for JSON parsing
+- Add stress tests for concurrent operations
+- Consider property-based testing for validators
+
+### 5. Documentation
+
+**Recommendations:**
+- Add architecture documentation explaining the overall design
+- Document the expected flow of data through the system
+- Add sequence diagrams for IPC communication
+- Document performance characteristics and limitations
+- Add troubleshooting guide
+
+## Module-Specific Recommendations
+
+### FrameForge Module
+
+#### Whisper Integration
+- The Whisper integration is incomplete in server mode
+- Consider extracting audio processing into a separate component
+- Add support for real-time audio streaming
+
+#### Command Validation
+- Consider using a formal grammar for command syntax
+- Add support for compound commands
+- Implement command history/undo functionality
+- Add command auto-completion support
+
+#### Performance
+- Profile the greedy sampling implementation
+- Consider caching vocabulary lookups
+- Optimize JSON parsing for large responses
+- Add metrics collection for monitoring
+
+### Semantic Server Module
+
+#### Intent Classification
+- The LLM prompt could be more structured
+- Consider fine-tuning a model specifically for intent classification
+- Add confidence scoring for classifications
+- Implement fallback strategies for low-confidence classifications
+
+#### Error Recovery
+- Add retry logic for transient failures
+- Implement circuit breaker pattern for external dependencies
+- Add graceful degradation when LLM is unavailable
+- Consider offline mode with cached responses
+
+## Security Recommendations
+
+### 1. Input Validation
+- Add comprehensive input sanitization
+- Validate all data from untrusted sources
+- Add rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks
+- Implement authentication for IPC endpoints
+
+### 2. Resource Limits
+- Add memory usage limits
+- Implement timeouts for all operations
+- Add request size limits
+- Monitor and log resource usage
+
+### 3. Privilege Separation
+- Run with minimal required privileges
+- Consider sandboxing for audio processing
+- Audit all file system access
+- Review use of temporary files
+
+## Code Modernization
+
+### C++ Best Practices
+- Use std::string_view where appropriate
+- Consider std::span for array parameters
+- Use std::optional instead of nullable pointers where appropriate
+- Consider std::variant for sum types
+
+### Build System
+- Add support for sanitizers (ASAN, UBSAN, TSAN)
+- Add static analysis tools (clang-tidy, cppcheck)
+- Set up continuous integration for all platforms
+- Add code coverage reporting
+
+## Performance Optimization Opportunities
+
+### 1. JSON Processing
+- Consider using a streaming JSON parser
+- Pre-compile JSON schemas for validation
+- Cache parsed JSON structures
+- Use custom allocators for frequent allocations
+
+### 2. IPC Communication
+- Consider using shared memory for large messages
+- Implement message batching for throughput
+- Add zero-copy transfer where possible
+- Profile and optimize hot paths
+
+### 3. LLM Inference
+- Implement request batching
+- Add model caching strategies
+- Consider quantization for faster inference
+- Profile token generation performance
+
+## Compatibility Considerations
+
+### Cross-Platform
+- Test on Windows, Linux, and macOS
+- Handle platform-specific file path separators
+- Consider endianness for binary protocols
+- Test on 32-bit and 64-bit architectures
+
+### Integration
+- Document dependencies and version requirements
+- Add compatibility testing with different llama.cpp versions
+- Consider versioning the IPC protocol
+- Add migration tools for breaking changes
+
+## Monitoring and Observability
+
+### Logging
+- Implement structured logging
+- Add log levels (DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR)
+- Consider rotating log files
+- Add correlation IDs for request tracing
+
+### Metrics
+- Add metrics for request latency
+- Monitor memory usage over time
+- Track error rates by type
+- Add health check endpoints
+
+### Debugging
+- Add verbose mode for troubleshooting
+- Include debug symbols in debug builds
+- Add assertion macros for invariants
+- Consider adding a debug console
+
+## Future Enhancements
+
+### Feature Ideas
+1. Support for multiple concurrent audio streams
+2. Real-time audio transcription with streaming results
+3. Multi-language support
+4. Voice activity detection
+5. Speaker diarization
+6. Noise suppression
+7. Audio preprocessing pipeline
+8. Custom wake word detection
+
+### Architecture Improvements
+1. Plugin system for extensibility
+2. Configuration management system
+3. Hot-reloading of models
+4. Distributed processing support
+5. REST API in addition to IPC
+6. WebSocket support for real-time updates
+
+## Contributing Guidelines
+
+### Code Review Checklist
+When addressing the unresolved comments or making other changes, consider:
+
+- [ ] All compiler warnings resolved
+- [ ] Static analysis passes (clang-tidy, cppcheck)
+- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
+- [ ] Integration tests pass
+- [ ] Documentation updated
+- [ ] CHANGELOG updated
+- [ ] Error handling reviewed
+- [ ] Resource cleanup verified
+- [ ] Thread safety considered
+- [ ] Security implications reviewed
+- [ ] Performance impact assessed
+- [ ] Cross-platform compatibility verified
+
+### Testing Requirements
+- New features must include tests
+- Bug fixes must include regression tests
+- Test coverage should not decrease
+- All tests must pass on all platforms
+- Performance tests for critical paths
+
+### Documentation Requirements
+- Public APIs must be documented
+- Complex algorithms must be explained
+- Usage examples should be provided
+- Breaking changes must be clearly marked
+- Migration guides for major changes
+
+---
+
+**Note:** These recommendations are based on industry best practices and common patterns in similar projects. Prioritize based on project needs and available resources.

From 108e0be6e7d4f5fe6b8e185e4c7c0023124ce2f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:40:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] Add documentation index for easy navigation

Co-authored-by: TheOriginalBytePlayer <18058224+TheOriginalBytePlayer@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 INDEX.md | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 206 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 INDEX.md

diff --git a/INDEX.md b/INDEX.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..da2036ce9399
--- /dev/null
+++ b/INDEX.md
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+# Code Review Documentation Index
+
+This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review comments from previously merged pull requests (#1 and #2), along with recommendations for addressing them.
+
+## Documents Overview
+
+### 📋 [UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md)
+**Primary reference document** containing detailed information about all 36 unresolved code review comments.
+
+**Contains:**
+- Complete list of all unresolved comments with full context
+- File paths and line numbers for each issue
+- Suggested fixes and code snippets
+- Severity classifications (Security, High, Medium, Low)
+- Owner requests tracking
+- Summary statistics
+
+**Use this when:** You need full context about a specific issue or want to understand the complete scope of unresolved comments.
+
+---
+
+### ⚡ [QUICK_REFERENCE.md](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md)
+**Quick lookup guide** for developers working on resolving the issues.
+
+**Contains:**
+- Issues organized by priority (Security → High → Medium → Low)
+- Time estimates for each issue (individual and total)
+- 4-phase implementation plan with timelines
+- Testing strategy checklist
+- Quick start guide
+- Dependencies between issues
+
+**Use this when:** You want to quickly find which issues to work on next, or need time estimates for planning.
+
+---
+
+### 💡 [RECOMMENDATIONS.md](./RECOMMENDATIONS.md)
+**Additional recommendations** beyond the specific unresolved comments.
+
+**Contains:**
+- General code quality recommendations
+- Security best practices
+- Performance optimization opportunities
+- Testing and documentation strategies
+- Module-specific improvements
+- Future enhancement ideas
+- Contributing guidelines and checklists
+
+**Use this when:** Planning broader improvements or looking for best practices to apply to new code.
+
+---
+
+## Quick Navigation
+
+### By Priority
+
+| Priority | Count | Documents |
+|----------|-------|-----------|
+| 🔴 Security | 1 | [UNRESOLVED §6](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#6-security-per-user-fifo-location-line-140), [QUICK §Priority 1](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-1-security-issues-1-comment) |
+| 🟠 High | 7 | [UNRESOLVED §3-4,11,23-24](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#ipc-handler-pr-2), [QUICK §Priority 2](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-7-comments) |
+| 🟡 Medium | 23 | [UNRESOLVED §1-2,5,7-9...](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-2-frameforge-sidecar), [QUICK §Priority 3-4](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-3-medium-severity---critical-12-comments) |
+| 🟢 Low | 6 | [UNRESOLVED §10,14-15,22,27,35-36](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-1-semantic-server), [QUICK §Priority 5](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-5-low-severity-6-comments) |
+
+### By Module
+
+| Module | Count | Primary Document |
+|--------|-------|------------------|
+| FrameForge (PR #2) | 22 | [UNRESOLVED §PR #2](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-2-frameforge-sidecar) |
+| Semantic Server (PR #1) | 14 | [UNRESOLVED §PR #1](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-1-semantic-server) |
+
+### By Component
+
+| Component | Issues | Location |
+|-----------|--------|----------|
+| IPC Handler | 13 | [Frameforge IPC](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#ipc-handler-pr-2) + [Semantic IPC](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#ipc-handler-pr-1) |
+| Sidecar/Server | 8 | [Sidecar](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#sidecar-application) + [Server](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#server-application) |
+| Validator | 6 | [Validator](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#validator) + [Command Validator](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#command-validator) |
+| Intent Engine | 5 | [Intent Engine](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#intent-engine) |
+| Testing/Build | 4 | [CMake and Testing](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#cmake-and-testing) |
+
+---
+
+## Getting Started
+
+### For Developers
+
+1. **Review the issues:**
+   ```bash
+   # Start with the detailed document
+   cat UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
+   
+   # Check the quick reference for prioritization
+   cat QUICK_REFERENCE.md
+   ```
+
+2. **Pick an issue to work on:**
+   - Start with [Security issues](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-1-security-issues-1-comment) (highest priority)
+   - Then [High severity](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-7-comments)
+   - Consider [owner-requested items](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#owner-requests)
+
+3. **Create a branch:**
+   ```bash
+   git checkout -b fix/issue-N-description
+   ```
+
+4. **Make changes following the suggested fixes in UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md**
+
+5. **Test thoroughly:**
+   - Add unit tests
+   - Run existing tests
+   - Test on multiple platforms
+   - Use sanitizers (ASAN, UBSAN, TSAN)
+
+6. **Submit a PR referencing the issue number**
+
+### For Project Managers
+
+- **Time estimates:** See [QUICK_REFERENCE.md](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md) for detailed time estimates
+- **Implementation plan:** 4 phases over 4-6 weeks (see [Phase breakdown](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#phase-1-security--critical-fixes-1-2-weeks))
+- **Resource allocation:** Issues can be parallelized across developers
+- **Risk assessment:** Security and High severity issues should be prioritized
+
+### For Code Reviewers
+
+- **Review checklist:** See [RECOMMENDATIONS.md §Contributing Guidelines](./RECOMMENDATIONS.md#contributing-guidelines)
+- **Testing requirements:** See [RECOMMENDATIONS.md §Testing Strategy](./RECOMMENDATIONS.md#testing-strategy)
+- **Best practices:** See [RECOMMENDATIONS.md](./RECOMMENDATIONS.md) for general recommendations
+
+---
+
+## Statistics
+
+### Overall Summary
+
+```
+Total Unresolved Comments: 36
+├── Security:  1 (2.8%)
+├── High:      7 (19.4%)
+├── Medium:   23 (63.9%)
+└── Low:       6 (16.7%)
+
+Estimated Total Time: 57.5-69.5 hours
+├── Phase 1 (Security & Critical): 17-27 hours
+├── Phase 2 (Stability):          18 hours
+├── Phase 3 (Quality):            20-22 hours
+└── Phase 4 (Polish):             2.5 hours
+```
+
+### By Source PR
+
+```
+PR #2 (FrameForge):      22 comments (61.1%)
+├── IPC Handler:         8
+├── Sidecar:            6
+├── Validator:          4
+└── CMake/Testing:      4
+
+PR #1 (Semantic Server): 14 comments (38.9%)
+├── IPC Handler:        5
+├── Intent Engine:      5
+├── Server:             2
+└── Command Validator:  2
+```
+
+---
+
+## Document Status
+
+| Document | Size | Last Updated | Status |
+|----------|------|--------------|--------|
+| UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md | 20KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
+| QUICK_REFERENCE.md | 7KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
+| RECOMMENDATIONS.md | 7KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
+| INDEX.md (this file) | 5KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
+
+---
+
+## Related Documentation
+
+- [CONTRIBUTING.md](./CONTRIBUTING.md) - General contribution guidelines for llama.cpp
+- [SECURITY.md](./SECURITY.md) - Security policy and vulnerability reporting
+- [README.md](./README.md) - Project overview and getting started
+
+---
+
+## Feedback and Updates
+
+If you find issues with this documentation or have suggestions for improvements:
+
+1. Create an issue with the label `documentation`
+2. Reference the specific document and section
+3. Suggest improvements or corrections
+
+---
+
+## Version History
+
+- **v1.0** (2025-12-29): Initial documentation release
+  - Created UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md with 36 issues
+  - Created QUICK_REFERENCE.md with prioritization and estimates
+  - Created RECOMMENDATIONS.md with best practices
+  - Created this INDEX.md for navigation
+
+---
+
+**Note:** These documents were created to help address technical debt from previously merged pull requests. They represent opportunities for improvement and should be tackled systematically according to the prioritization provided.

From 29e12fd5c57e4aa2d44e2d5cfae0af27afca1515 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:42:30 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] Fix documentation issues from code review feedback

Co-authored-by: TheOriginalBytePlayer <18058224+TheOriginalBytePlayer@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 INDEX.md               | 14 +++++++-------
 QUICK_REFERENCE.md     | 10 ++++++----
 UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/INDEX.md b/INDEX.md
index da2036ce9399..23070de83ac2 100644
--- a/INDEX.md
+++ b/INDEX.md
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review co
 | Priority | Count | Documents |
 |----------|-------|-----------|
 | 🔴 Security | 1 | [UNRESOLVED §6](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#6-security-per-user-fifo-location-line-140), [QUICK §Priority 1](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-1-security-issues-1-comment) |
-| 🟠 High | 7 | [UNRESOLVED §3-4,11,23-24](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#ipc-handler-pr-2), [QUICK §Priority 2](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-7-comments) |
+| 🟠 High | 6 | [UNRESOLVED §3-4,11,23-24](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#ipc-handler-pr-2), [QUICK §Priority 2](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-6-comments) |
 | 🟡 Medium | 23 | [UNRESOLVED §1-2,5,7-9...](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-2-frameforge-sidecar), [QUICK §Priority 3-4](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-3-medium-severity---critical-12-comments) |
 | 🟢 Low | 6 | [UNRESOLVED §10,14-15,22,27,35-36](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-1-semantic-server), [QUICK §Priority 5](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-5-low-severity-6-comments) |
 
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@ This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review co
 ```
 Total Unresolved Comments: 36
 ├── Security:  1 (2.8%)
-├── High:      7 (19.4%)
+├── High:      6 (16.7%)
 ├── Medium:   23 (63.9%)
 └── Low:       6 (16.7%)
 
-Estimated Total Time: 57.5-69.5 hours
-├── Phase 1 (Security & Critical): 17-27 hours
+Estimated Total Time: 55.5-67.5 hours
+├── Phase 1 (Security & Critical): 15-25 hours
 ├── Phase 2 (Stability):          18 hours
 ├── Phase 3 (Quality):            20-22 hours
 └── Phase 4 (Polish):             2.5 hours
@@ -177,9 +177,9 @@ PR #1 (Semantic Server): 14 comments (38.9%)
 
 ## Related Documentation
 
-- [CONTRIBUTING.md](./CONTRIBUTING.md) - General contribution guidelines for llama.cpp
-- [SECURITY.md](./SECURITY.md) - Security policy and vulnerability reporting
-- [README.md](./README.md) - Project overview and getting started
+- [CONTRIBUTING.md](../CONTRIBUTING.md) - General contribution guidelines for llama.cpp
+- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md) - Security policy and vulnerability reporting
+- [README.md](../README.md) - Project overview and getting started
 
 ---
 
diff --git a/QUICK_REFERENCE.md b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
index d880ea3a6bd3..c55be03ec3a4 100644
--- a/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
+++ b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ This document provides a quick reference for addressing the 36 unresolved code r
 
 **Action:** Modify IPC implementation to use `$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR` or per-user `/tmp` directory with proper permissions.
 
-## Priority 2: High Severity (7 comments)
+## Priority 2: High Severity (6 comments)
 
 | # | File | Line | Issue | Estimate |
 |---|------|------|-------|----------|
@@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ This document provides a quick reference for addressing the 36 unresolved code r
 | 23 | tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h | 176 | Windows handle validation | 2-3 hours |
 | 24 | tools/semantic-server/ipc-handler.h | 73 | Stop method hang | 2-3 hours |
 
-**Total Estimate:** 15-23 hours
+**Total Estimate:** 13-21 hours
+
+Note: Issue #6 (Security) was previously counted in this section but is now properly categorized under Priority 1 (Security).
 
 ## Priority 3: Medium Severity - Critical (12 comments)
 
@@ -96,11 +98,11 @@ This document provides a quick reference for addressing the 36 unresolved code r
 | Priority | Count | Estimated Time |
 |----------|-------|----------------|
 | Security | 1 | 2-4 hours |
-| High | 6 | 15-23 hours |
+| High | 6 | 13-21 hours |
 | Medium (Critical) | 12 | 18 hours |
 | Medium (Important) | 11 | 20-22 hours |
 | Low | 6 | 2.5 hours |
-| **TOTAL** | **36** | **57.5-69.5 hours** |
+| **TOTAL** | **36** | **55.5-67.5 hours** |
 
 ## Recommended Approach
 
diff --git a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
index b61e69009392..224824971e5c 100644
--- a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
+++ b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Unresolved Code Review Comments
 
-This document captures all unresolved code review comments from merged PRs #1 and #2. These comments were made by automated code review but were not addressed before the PRs were merged.
+This document captures all unresolved code review comments from merged PRs #1 and #2. These comments were made by the Copilot Pull Request Reviewer but were not addressed before the PRs were merged.
 
 ## Table of Contents
 
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ while (std::getline(std::cin, line)) {
 
 **Suggested Fix:**
 ```cpp
-char buf[WAV_HEADER_SIZE];
+char buf[WAV_HEADER_SIZE] = {0};  // Zero-initialize for safety
 ```
 
 ---

From 04a05435a3a1c97e9b6d1ee2fe02bfcc43e1dcd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:44:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] Fix final count consistency issues in documentation

Co-authored-by: TheOriginalBytePlayer <18058224+TheOriginalBytePlayer@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 INDEX.md               | 2 +-
 UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/INDEX.md b/INDEX.md
index 23070de83ac2..c5cb816a1dfc 100644
--- a/INDEX.md
+++ b/INDEX.md
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review co
 
 2. **Pick an issue to work on:**
    - Start with [Security issues](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-1-security-issues-1-comment) (highest priority)
-   - Then [High severity](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-7-comments)
+   - Then [High severity](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-6-comments)
    - Consider [owner-requested items](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#owner-requests)
 
 3. **Create a branch:**
diff --git a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
index 224824971e5c..f9acd4558cc0 100644
--- a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
+++ b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ c = std::toupper(static_cast<unsigned char>(c));
 ## Summary Statistics
 
 - **Total Comments:** 36
-- **High Severity:** 7
+- **High Severity:** 6
 - **Medium Severity:** 23
 - **Low Severity:** 6
 - **Security Issues:** 1

From 1190c896526b6555c50d64bad0557f6c65f69568 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TheOriginalBytePlayer <prez@frameforge3d.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 22:40:22 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] Update QUICK_REFERENCE.md

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 QUICK_REFERENCE.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/QUICK_REFERENCE.md b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
index c55be03ec3a4..e38c1159b5ae 100644
--- a/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
+++ b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
@@ -168,5 +168,5 @@ These should be prioritized.
 
 ---
 
-**Last Updated:** 2025-12-29
+**Last Updated:** 2025-12-30
 **Document Version:** 1.0

From f4a92b6bd1509e764c44d42f992b89fee934b301 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TheOriginalBytePlayer <prez@frameforge3d.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 22:40:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] Update INDEX.md

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 INDEX.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/INDEX.md b/INDEX.md
index c5cb816a1dfc..3729788d1868 100644
--- a/INDEX.md
+++ b/INDEX.md
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ PR #1 (Semantic Server): 14 comments (38.9%)
 | UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md | 20KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
 | QUICK_REFERENCE.md | 7KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
 | RECOMMENDATIONS.md | 7KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
-| INDEX.md (this file) | 5KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
+| INDEX.md (this file) | 5KB | 2025-12-30 | ✅ Complete |
 
 ---
 

From 9e31ce42f6f9ac24130e65307cc6617e944bdd96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TheOriginalBytePlayer <prez@frameforge3d.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 22:40:59 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] Update INDEX.md

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 INDEX.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/INDEX.md b/INDEX.md
index 3729788d1868..c9ac2d31329b 100644
--- a/INDEX.md
+++ b/INDEX.md
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ If you find issues with this documentation or have suggestions for improvements:
 
 ## Version History
 
-- **v1.0** (2025-12-29): Initial documentation release
+- **v1.0** (2025-12-30): Initial documentation release
   - Created UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md with 36 issues
   - Created QUICK_REFERENCE.md with prioritization and estimates
   - Created RECOMMENDATIONS.md with best practices

From e90246601465b50150cc22a0e437c6ca70e27897 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TheOriginalBytePlayer <prez@frameforge3d.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 22:41:33 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] Update INDEX.md

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 INDEX.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/INDEX.md b/INDEX.md
index c9ac2d31329b..c7ae407d3a74 100644
--- a/INDEX.md
+++ b/INDEX.md
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review co
 
 ```
 Total Unresolved Comments: 36
-├── Security:  1 (2.8%)
-├── High:      6 (16.7%)
+├── Security:  2 (5.6%)
+├── High:      5 (13.9%)
 ├── Medium:   23 (63.9%)
 └── Low:       6 (16.7%)
 

From e034eddafd28afbf6a20358b6b0aa94b5dd00ea5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TheOriginalBytePlayer <prez@frameforge3d.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 22:42:23 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] Update UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
index f9acd4558cc0..57ae73002577 100644
--- a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
+++ b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
@@ -448,5 +448,5 @@ c = std::toupper(static_cast<unsigned char>(c));
 
 ---
 
-**Document Generated:** 2025-12-29
+**Document Generated:** 2025-12-30
 **Source PRs:** #1, #2

From 42d091657ce2f67d2b3385f7a6575042388ec398 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 06:57:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] Fix dates and high severity count consistency across
 all docs

Co-authored-by: TheOriginalBytePlayer <18058224+TheOriginalBytePlayer@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 INDEX.md               | 12 ++++++------
 QUICK_REFERENCE.md     |  4 ++--
 UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md |  6 +++---
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/INDEX.md b/INDEX.md
index c7ae407d3a74..b1ea6e38da90 100644
--- a/INDEX.md
+++ b/INDEX.md
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review co
 | Priority | Count | Documents |
 |----------|-------|-----------|
 | 🔴 Security | 1 | [UNRESOLVED §6](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#6-security-per-user-fifo-location-line-140), [QUICK §Priority 1](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-1-security-issues-1-comment) |
-| 🟠 High | 6 | [UNRESOLVED §3-4,11,23-24](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#ipc-handler-pr-2), [QUICK §Priority 2](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-6-comments) |
+| 🟠 High | 5 | [UNRESOLVED §3-4,11,23-24](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#ipc-handler-pr-2), [QUICK §Priority 2](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-5-comments) |
 | 🟡 Medium | 23 | [UNRESOLVED §1-2,5,7-9...](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-2-frameforge-sidecar), [QUICK §Priority 3-4](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-3-medium-severity---critical-12-comments) |
 | 🟢 Low | 6 | [UNRESOLVED §10,14-15,22,27,35-36](./UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md#pr-1-semantic-server), [QUICK §Priority 5](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-5-low-severity-6-comments) |
 
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review co
 
 2. **Pick an issue to work on:**
    - Start with [Security issues](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-1-security-issues-1-comment) (highest priority)
-   - Then [High severity](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-6-comments)
+   - Then [High severity](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#priority-2-high-severity-5-comments)
    - Consider [owner-requested items](./QUICK_REFERENCE.md#owner-requests)
 
 3. **Create a branch:**
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ This directory contains comprehensive documentation of unresolved code review co
 
 ```
 Total Unresolved Comments: 36
-├── Security:  2 (5.6%)
+├── Security:  1 (2.8%)
 ├── High:      5 (13.9%)
 ├── Medium:   23 (63.9%)
 └── Low:       6 (16.7%)
@@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ PR #1 (Semantic Server): 14 comments (38.9%)
 
 | Document | Size | Last Updated | Status |
 |----------|------|--------------|--------|
-| UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md | 20KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
-| QUICK_REFERENCE.md | 7KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
-| RECOMMENDATIONS.md | 7KB | 2025-12-29 | ✅ Complete |
+| UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md | 20KB | 2025-12-30 | ✅ Complete |
+| QUICK_REFERENCE.md | 7KB | 2025-12-30 | ✅ Complete |
+| RECOMMENDATIONS.md | 7KB | 2025-12-30 | ✅ Complete |
 | INDEX.md (this file) | 5KB | 2025-12-30 | ✅ Complete |
 
 ---
diff --git a/QUICK_REFERENCE.md b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
index e38c1159b5ae..bdbc4c373c7a 100644
--- a/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
+++ b/QUICK_REFERENCE.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ This document provides a quick reference for addressing the 36 unresolved code r
 
 **Action:** Modify IPC implementation to use `$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR` or per-user `/tmp` directory with proper permissions.
 
-## Priority 2: High Severity (6 comments)
+## Priority 2: High Severity (5 comments)
 
 | # | File | Line | Issue | Estimate |
 |---|------|------|-------|----------|
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Note: Issue #6 (Security) was previously counted in this section but is now prop
 | Priority | Count | Estimated Time |
 |----------|-------|----------------|
 | Security | 1 | 2-4 hours |
-| High | 6 | 13-21 hours |
+| High | 5 | 13-21 hours |
 | Medium (Critical) | 12 | 18 hours |
 | Medium (Important) | 11 | 20-22 hours |
 | Low | 6 | 2.5 hours |
diff --git a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
index 57ae73002577..ec890bf6b6f5 100644
--- a/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
+++ b/UNRESOLVED_COMMENTS.md
@@ -410,10 +410,10 @@ c = std::toupper(static_cast<unsigned char>(c));
 ## Summary Statistics
 
 - **Total Comments:** 36
-- **High Severity:** 6
+- **Security Issues:** 1 (classified as high severity)
+- **High Severity:** 5 (plus 1 security issue = 6 total high severity)
 - **Medium Severity:** 23
 - **Low Severity:** 6
-- **Security Issues:** 1
 
 ### By Module
 - **PR #2 (FrameForge):** 22 comments
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ c = std::toupper(static_cast<unsigned char>(c));
 1. **Security Issues** (1 comment)
    - Comment #6: Per-user FIFO location
 
-2. **High Severity** (6 additional comments)
+2. **High Severity** (5 additional comments)
    - Comment #3: Non-blocking I/O error handling
    - Comment #4: IPCServer callback not invoked
    - Comment #11: Server mode not implemented
