-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 262
Description
It is very disheartening that Live Share is under a restrictive license. LICENSE-CODE is also very misleading :(
I did some digging around myself and know there are things that might not exactly be something you'd want eyes on (e.g. testing, and internal work/domains). That's okay.
Considering that Visual Studio Code itself is based on "Visual Studio Code - Open Source", then afterwards receives Microsoft telemetry / branding / relicensing post-build (source), and the extension gallery requires use of an official Microsoft-created Visual Studio Code install (it seems), I see no reason for Live Share to not work similarly, if needed at all.
And for that internal stuff/testing, my mind immediately goes to Live Share Audio. Perhaps it could be split up.
I really, really would love to contribute and would love to see this extension flourish, but I believe the restrictive license Live Share is currently under only causes harm. There are great developers who are involved in both making Code OSS and countless extensions.
From the amount of people who I've seen who have taken the time to give this repository a star, many of them I'm sure would be willing to help out and not only suggest something new, but help the backlog of feature requests, and make new plugins for Live Share.
The earliest issue I've found of this was from 2018, with plans for it in the future (see #534). There was another issue in 2019 (#2953), just saying "not yet".
It's now been three to four years with no major word since then. Whatever they are, there are so many great possibilities that could happen from a switch to an open source license like MIT. Please make those plans a higher priority.