In Silico Pathogen Classification Using Vital Signs + Labs — Seeking MIMIC-IV Validation Partners #1974
Unanswered
netanelcyber
asked this question in
MIMIC-General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
👋 Introduction
Hi MIMIC community,
I'm the developer of PenuX — an in silico engine for pathogen-specific
classification based on routine clinical parameters (WBC, SpO2, temperature,
HR, RR, CRP, Lactate, Procalcitonin).
Rather than predicting sepsis as a binary outcome, PenuX classifies across
12 specific pathogens (e.g., MRSA, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Candida),
providing a ranked differential with an explainable clinical conclusion per
classification — designed as a clinical decision support tool.
🎯 What I'm Looking For
I'm seeking collaborators or feedback on:
MIMIC-IV cohort extraction — Is there a validated SQL/Python query
for extracting confirmed bacteremia/fungemia cases with matching vitals
and lab values from
mimiciv_hosp+mimiciv_icu?OMOP CDM alignment — Has anyone mapped MIMIC-IV to OMOP CDM for
infectious disease cohorts specifically? I saw
mimic-omopbut itappears MIMIC-III focused.
Validation partners — Anyone working on pathogen-level (not just
sepsis-level) ML classification who would be interested in comparing
cohorts or pipelines?
🔬 Current Status
(
microbiologyeventstable)📎 Relevant Tables I'm Targeting
mimiciv_hosp.microbiologyeventsmimiciv_hosp.labeventsmimiciv_icu.charteventsmimiciv_hosp.diagnoses_icdAny pointers, prior work, or collaboration interest welcome.
Happy to share the PenuX repo for review.
Thanks 🙏
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions